글 수 630

   U-class 시스템은 무엇인지, 현재 U-class 시스템의 현황은 어떻게 되고 있는지,

   U-class의 지속에 대한 찬/반 의견과 앞으로 나아가야 할 방향에 대해 살펴 본 기사입니다.

 

 

“I took the U-class lecture this semester. Isn’t this just a class with an automatic attendance checking machine where I put my student ID card?” said a student of lecture ‘Eastern Mythologies, Western Mythologies’. You might have heard once about U-class if you are a student of Kyung Hee University (KHU). However, the majority does not know much about U-class, and indeed it seems the system is not operating properly though the administration is investing much money on it. Let’s find out what U-class really are, and what needs to be done to make U-class better.

What is the U-class?

U-class, interactive teaching support system, needs active participation from both professors and students. When students put their student ID cards into the card reader on the desk, all the information about their attendance and seating, etc, is delivered to a monitor the professor is using in real time. Professors can check students’ responses about the contents of the lecture and give a quick quiz to many students. Due to these features of U-class, students may be able to participate actively in class and professors can also check attendance in a convenient way and make a number of students more focused on the lecture.

U-class has been conducted with the goal of two-way communication between professors and students since 2006. Kim, Young-rak, Assistant Manager of Administration of Humanitas College said, “Lecturers can lighten the burden of lecture in a large classroom with this system. We hope that students will be content with the enhanced quality of lectures via such a high tech system.”

 

Present State of U-class in KHU

There are four and five U-class lecture rooms at Chungungwan and Obis hall in Seoul campus respectively, and two lecture rooms at Multimedia Hall in Global campus. There were about 185 lectures assigned in last semester. However, despite many students being assigned to U-class lectures, the numbers using the system were few. According to statistics from last year, the ratio of log-ons for checking attendance was about 75%. However, the ratio of other functions used was barely 15% except for checking attendance.


 

In addition, there is no proper managing department in our university. The Humanitas College, where U-class lecture rooms are located, is compelled to administer this system. As this department assigns U-class to professors without considering the unique features of every lecture, professors have to give lectures that are titled ‘U-class’ against their will. Therefore, the department cannot force them to use the U-class system. Although a professor does not use the U-class system, lectures conducted in U-class lecture rooms are regarded as ‘U-class’ on-line.

Besides, the breakdown of some card readers makes the U-class system hard to run, though the college has spent five million won per semester for repair and management.

Two points of view about U-class



1. Shin, Myoung-hee, lecturer of Modern Society and Advertisement
While using the U-class system, some functions such as automatic attendance checking, giving quick quizzes, etc, are helpful to me. But, I have to doubt the cost-effectiveness of this system. At first, I used this system for checking attendance in order to reduce the burden of managing many students. At the beginning, the function of the U-class was effective with students to focus on class. Over time, however, the effect declined.

2. Kim, Ju-kyong, lecturer of ‘Analysis of Quantitative Reasoning’
The functions I usually used were automatic attendance checking through student ID card and adding or subtracting grade points immediately depending on the attitudes and participation of students. In addition, ‘Attention’, cautioning students who don’t concentrate on class, was special to me. I also gave a lecture at Doowon Technical College last semester, in which the number of students was about 80. Lecturing at both schools, I could be aware of the effect of the U-class system. The U-class system helped make up for the weak points of lectures for many students, for example, communication with students and checking students’ attitudes in real time, etc.”

How to Revitalize U-class

There is a diversity of opinion about U-class. Meanwhile, U-class lecture rooms will be expanded on the Global Campus. “We decided to spend one hundred million won every year for four years in total. It is planned to enlarge four more U-class lecture rooms every year, and now we are considering about the details,” said Park, Eun-kyu, Section Chief, Office of Academic Affairs of Global Campus at KHU. Kim at Humanitas College added, “The U-class system can not only supplement the weaknesses of lectures for many students, but it can represent the teaching system of KHU.”

But, it’s never a solution to increase the number of U-class classrooms. It seems that the U-class system has many weaknesses even though it has been conducted for six years.

Then, what should the U-class system be like? First of all, KHU should reorganize the U-class homepage in a practical way and invigorate the site. Online administration for U-class is rarely used except when you want to check whether you took any classes using U-class classrooms (surely you may not). There are now manuals on how to use U-class machines on the homepage but the site needs to show more personal histories like what kinds of functions are used in classes students are taking.

Above all, for better use of the U-class system, KHU has to try to promote U-class lectures. There is almost no lecture on how to utilize U-class system for professors. Students have no chance to learn what U-class is. “Professors and students are inexperienced in using the U-class system, thus the effect of U-class falls short of expectations,” said an anonymous professor. KHU is supposed to create lectures or education programs of U-class for professors. And for students’ understanding of and interest in using U-class, they have to give notice about U-class lectures in advance before registering for classes.

The system needs to be complemented both in function and system for drawing students’ active participation and professors’ steady use. The U-class system needs to improve in order to contribute to the advancement of grand scale lecture.

번호
글쓴이
630 대학주보 [알림] 대학주보 중간고사 휴간 종료 안내
대학주보
2011-11-01 3403
629 대학주보 [1518호] 농구부 김종규 선수 런던 올림픽 최종엔트리 포함
대학주보
2012-06-04 3408
628 대학주보 [1507호] “반값등록금·생협 유치 어떻게 할 건가요?”
대학주보
2011-12-06 3443
627 대학주보 [1498호] 튜터링제 악용 여전 … 점검 강화·의식개선 필요
대학주보
2011-09-20 3462
626 대학주보 [1514호] 이미지 개선·캠퍼스 종합개발·학사제도 개선 특별팀 신설
대학주보
2012-05-30 3473
625 대학주보 [1515호] 외국인 교류 '버디프로그램' 시행
대학주보
2012-05-30 3518
624 대학주보 [1504호] 미래협약, 구성원 의견차 드러나기 시작
대학주보
2011-11-14 3522
623 대학주보 [1518호] 양 캠퍼스 총학, 지역사회에 축제 수익금 400만 원 기부
대학주보
2012-06-08 3522
622 대학주보 [알림] 대학주보가 지령 1500호를 맞았습니다.
대학주보
2011-10-04 3563
621 대학주보 [1515호] 캠퍼스종합개발, 4일 법인 이사회서 승인 2
대학주보
2012-05-30 3565
620 대학주보 [알림] 개강호가 발행됐습니다.
대학주보
2011-08-29 3586
619 대학주보 [1516호] “우리학교 학생들의 응원 소리를 듣고 싶어요” file
대학주보
2012-05-30 3592
618 대학주보 [1503호] ‘파죽지세’ 사자군단, 대학리그엔 적수가 없다
대학주보
2011-11-08 3595
617 대학주보 [1500호] 축구부, 조 3위로 U리그 챔피언십 진출
대학주보
2011-10-04 3606
616 대학주보 [1499호] 양 캠퍼스 취업률 ‘반타작’ 서울 54.1%, 국제 54.8%
대학주보
2011-09-27 3613
615 대학주보 [1529호] 확대되는 입학사정관 전형, 2014년 30%까지
대학주보
2012-11-19 3634
614 대학주보 [1504호] 지키지 않는 공약(公約)은 선심성 공약(空約)일 뿐
대학주보
2011-11-14 3642
613 대학주보 [1503호] 도서반납·연체료 납부, 도서관 어디서나 가능해진다
대학주보
2011-11-08 3652
612 대학주보 [알림] 특별한 기사, 미디어센터 스페셜을 통해 접하세요!
대학주보
2011-07-28 3668
611 대학주보 [1529호] “다양성이 우리학교 입시의 키워드”
대학주보
2012-11-19 3676
610 대학주보 [방중소식] 캠퍼스종합개발 수정안, 공사규모 축소된 잠정안으로 발표
대학주보
2011-08-26 3695
609 대학주보 [1499호] 국제캠, 캠퍼스종합개발 수정안 두고 협의 지연
대학주보
2011-09-27 3696
608 대학주보 [1500호] 약학대학 만족도 79점으로‘최고’ 양 캠퍼스 평균 만족도 66점 … 지난해와 동일
대학주보
2011-10-04 3704
607 대학주보 [1515호] 총학, 캠퍼스종합개발 · 미해결 과제 이행 촉구 등록금 논의는 2.5% 인하로 최종합의에 근접
대학주보
2012-05-30 3707
606 대학주보 [방중소식] 학자금대출자·장학생 등록금 환불 불이행 논란, 오해로 밝혀져
대학주보
2011-08-26 3720
605 대학주보 [1537호] “대학평가 결과에 연연하지 말아야”
대학주보
2013-05-28 3760
604 대학주보 [1513호] 서울캠 학자요구안 수용 총투표 가결 1 file
대학주보
2012-04-17 3770